But our government is not giving full support to the troops.

Due to the week political leadership our forces have to see the what they never want to.its war of 1971 or kargil of 1999 Every time the Political leadership has proven coward .They demoralize our forces that is the reason that our neighboring country is becoming so dare-full .

Reasons the whole country is gripping in the terrorism our armed forces has courage to bring all the terrorist and terrorist activities to an end with in 48 hours but the main problem is political leadership which is between the way .

Due to less care of the families of the martyrs now the young generation is remaining abstain from joining the army .In the past years the armed forces have not so much youth candidate they think why to join army .No respect and after death a medal which has proven a myth .

The parents and other family members of the martyrs are forced to live the life which is full of poverty .

Its not enough to award them a medal now the family of the martyrs should be treated as the VIP as we are alive as they have laid down their lives we all should realize this .

Now they have a chance to prove it. They should pass a responsible funding bill that gives our men and women in uniform the resources they need -- and the support they have earned."

Manish Zijoo- A youth avenging Kashmir

The more cruel the more inhumane the action is , the more terrorism needs the TV Media to make an impression on its targets and put over its messages practically in real time with a world wide awareness .Similarly those televisions studios draw benefits from the unbearable and inhumane images they broadcast .Today television & terrorism form a diabolical duo which is making our struggle more & more difficult .This is an irreversible fact that we will have to take cute account in our future .

The terrorist enterprises are criminal enterprises like any other .They operate according the rules of market with the horizontal or vertical integration.

However we need to begin by taking in consideration the stock of problems that are still pending first of which is debate on the definition of the word terrorism .As we know one of the most lapidary definitions used by Press & Philosophy which is without meaning is to state that the terrorist is always considered as freedom fighter (militant )

This thing has given wrong message between the people of particular religion that If we become terrorist we are fighting a battle for the religion .

This is important for all the human being to stop terrorism spreading in means of way .The Media has to say NO to the news of the terrorists and to define them as militants .

If we will flash their New they re gaining popularity and are getting what they don't .

Every newspaper & electronic media is very interested to cover the news of those anti nationalist .

Now the position is this that the students of today don't know who is the Prime minister of the country but they are well aware that who is Osama Bin Laden who is Yasin malik etc .The patriotisms is dying and the anti nationalists are raining .

This is very much disgusting that even the leaders of our country shrugs their shoulders & just say pakistan is behind all this .Its now 18 years from when we are hearing that pakistan is behind all this and what you are doing just engaged to encash the kashmir for vested intrest .Kashmir is biggest problem of india after indian independence and we will not completely republic and secular & independent till we will not make our paradise turn hell to a paradise,

Manish zijoo- A youth avenging kashmir

Every where there is cry that the reason of down fall of hindus in India is caste-ism but I want to know from all of you that who has made this caste system we are those who have made this system & now we had to come up to end this system .I want to know one thing that what we are we are Pandits /Rajputs etc first or we are Hindus First .

If we are Hindus first then we have to work for our ism as we can see in India those so called politician have divided us in the name of caste for their vested interests those politicians who become politicians with money or muscle have no public likings .

We are casting vote to those people because we don't have any alternative and the youth of today is not ready to be politician as those have made the politics such smutty we can see the youth politicians which are coming up are the sons and daughters of all those so called politicians no one new from masses is there ready to join the politics

There is example of Kashmir why Hindus have been forced to live life of refugee in their own country is there any body who can answer No there is no one

We should take lesson from this that a biggest un happening thing happened in last millennium and No investigation is ordered for the Exodus of hundreds of thousands of Hindu people forced to exile .But when few people killed in Gujrat lot of hue and cry is made why? The reason is vote bank but if they are minority then which vote bank this is astonishing that the minority is vote bank

This is the most appropriate time Now if we will not came up leaving this all behind the caste-ism we will have to pay a lot .We have experience of this from Kashmir .

This is not the blog this is the voice of my heart the voice of hindus .We have to make this voice loud the voice that reaches ever where no one is over Hinduism.

Every one has to do his work on work if one is Pundit he has to look after Temples if one is Rajput he has to defend the religion/country etc- But when the time of religion is there

All voice should be one

One thing moer i have noted when Pravin Bhai marchs with Trishul its an offence but when in Public rally Imam bukhari says I am Pakistani agent this is not offence why ?

To show the glimpses of Dharam is crime

and to utter any thing against The country .What is this ? This is award winning act

Remember politicians nothing is over country don't pursue for own interest.

That was amazing being hindu when we see some of our politicians challenges the presence of Ram .

I just want to ask them one question that how the start their daily proceedings ?

If they are married had they taken satapadi against scared fire

How their Crimination will be done ?

Manish A youth avenging Kashmir

Scenario one: The status quo

Kashmir has been a flashpoint between India and Pakistan for more than 50 years. Currently a boundary - the Line of Control - divides the region in two, with one part administered by India and one by Pakistan. India would like to formalise this status quo and make it the accepted international boundary. But Pakistan and Kashmiri activists reject this plan because they both want greater control over the region.

Scenario two: Kashmir joins Pakistan

Pakistan has consistently favoured this as the best solution to the dispute. In view of the state's majority Muslim population, it believes that it would vote to become part of Pakistan. However a single plebiscite held in a region which comprises peoples that are culturally, religiously and ethnically diverse, would create disaffected minorities. The Hindus of Jammu, and the Buddhists of Ladakh have never shown any desire to join Pakistan and would protest at the outcome.

Scenario three: Kashmir joins India

Such a solution would be unlikely to bring stability to the region as the Muslim inhabitants of Pakistani-administered Jammu and Kashmir, including the Northern Areas, have never shown any desire to become part of India.

Scenario four: Independent Kashmir

The difficulty of adopting this as a potential solution is that it requires India and Pakistan to give up territory, which they are not willing to do. Any plebiscite or referendum likely to result in a majority vote for independence would therefore probably be opposed by both India and Pakistan. It would also be rejected by the inhabitants of the state who are content with their status as part of the countries to which they already owe allegiance.

Scenario five: A smaller independent Kashmir

An independent Kashmir could be created from the Kashmir Valley - currently under Indian administration - and the narrow strip of land which Pakistan calls Azad Jammu and Kashmir. This would leave the strategically important regions of the Northern Areas and Ladakh, bordering China, under the control of Pakistan and India respectively. However both India and Pakistan would be unlikely to enter into discussions which would have this scenario as a possible outcome

Scenario six: Independent Kashmir Valley

An independent Kashmir Valley has been considered by some as the best solution because it would address the grievances of those who have been fighting against the Indian Government since the insurgency began in 1989. But critics say that, without external assistance, the region would not be economically viab

Scenario seven: The Chenab formula

This plan, first suggested in the 1960s, would see Kashmir divided along the line of the River Chenab. This would give the vast majority of land to Pakistan and, as such, a clear victory in its longstanding dispute with India. The entire valley with its Muslim majority population would be brought within Pakistan's borders, as well as the majority Muslim areas of Jammu.

ManishZijoo-A youth Avenging Avenging Kashmir

I am very much disappointed to See that the organization which is made for the Human rights is not doing what is its original purpose .

I am Kashmiri guy who have to exile from the state of the Jammu & Kashmir Due to the evil of terrorism .

Hundreds of thousands of the people have to live of refugee in their own country due to this evil of terrorism just the reason we are hindus

No body came forward to provide relief to the oppressed even when united states led war against the terrorism .Whole world shows his support to the United states in the war against terrorism but Nobody remember the people who are the most victim of terrorism .

The hindus are not Human beings and do we don't have Human rights .

If we are Human beings and we have human rights then where are our Human rights .We are not enjoying any Human rights .I was too young when we have to leave the valley of the Kashmir this is very disgraceful not for the people of Kashmir only but for the whole world .

This incident is first of its own type when a community have to live life of refugee in their own country not due to any natural clamity but due to the the people who are involved in terrorist activity this is incident is shame for the whole world and the war against terrorism is not successful until Kashmiri people will not get their right .

Still Their is No Voice For The People Of Kashmir -----------why ?

This question arise in our mind as we are peace lovers , we are patriotic we have been punished .

Amnesty International is the organization who look after human rights ,even of the criminals but this is regrettable know that the rights of the Innocents is nowhere .

All the Human right organizations are myth .If they are not able to give right to the people of the Kashmir.

This is the an appeal of the people who are in great pain and mental agony and are not enjoying any human rights .

I have read about the following HUMAN RIGHTS. But Iam Sorry To Write Where Are These .these are like fairy tales for us .

What ever this is adoptedd is for particular people .

On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."

PREAMBLE

Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,

Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people,

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,

Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations,

Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in co-operation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms,

Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge,

Now, Therefore THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY proclaims THIS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.

Article 1.

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 2.

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

Article 3.

Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

Article 4.

No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 6.

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.

Article 7.

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 8.

Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

Article 9.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 10.

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.

Article 11.

(1) Everyone charged with a penal offence has the right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty according to law in a public trial at which he has had all the guarantees necessary for his defence.

(2) No one shall be held guilty of any penal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a penal offence, under national or international law, at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the penal offence was committed.

Article 12.

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 13.

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state.

(2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country.

Article 14.

(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.

(2) This right may not be invoked in the case of prosecutions genuinely arising from non-political crimes or from acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 15.

(1) Everyone has the right to a nationality.

(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.

Article 16.

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.

(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17.

(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.

(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 18.

Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.

Article 19.

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

Article 20.

(1) Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.

(2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 21.

(1) Everyone has the right to take part in the government of his country, directly or through freely chosen representatives.

(2) Everyone has the right of equal access to public service in his country.

(3) The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret vote or by equivalent free voting procedures.

Article 22.

Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

(1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

(2) Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work.

(3) Everyone who works has the right to just and favourable remuneration ensuring for himself and his family an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.

(4) Everyone has the right to form and to join trade unions for the protection of his interests.

Article 24.

Everyone has the right to rest and leisure, including reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays with pay.

Article 25.

(1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

(2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26.

(1) Everyone has the right to education. Education shall be free, at least in the elementary and fundamental stages. Elementary education shall be compulsory. Technical and professional education shall be made generally available and higher education shall be equally accessible to all on the basis of merit.

(2) Education shall be directed to the full development of the human personality and to the strengthening of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms. It shall promote understanding, tolerance and friendship among all nations, racial or religious groups, and shall further the activities of the United Nations for the maintenance of peace.

(3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 27.

(1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits.

(2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which he is the author.

Article 28.

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized.

Article 29.

(1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

(2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

(3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth

Manish Zijoo - a youth avenging kashmir

These people who want to divide the country should be thrown in prison.

Those people should not be allowed to contest any type of election any where in India and a case of Waging war against country should be Imposed on such people who gives such comments in the public and misguide the people only for their vested intrests

No one is above the country and keeping in view this everybody who utters a single word against the dignity of the country should be treated as a culprit keeping aside his personal profile whether he is politician or anyone else .

This is very much disgusting that the people are uttering words without any fear to gain political mileage A ban should be imposed on these type of politicians and their political parties.

This astonishing the man Afzal Guru Who has done a heinous crime of attacking the Nations sovereignty whom supreme court has given the judgment of death request is with the Honorable President t for the clemency our leaders impotent leaders are saying that if Afzal Guru will be hanged then he will become a martyr .I want to ask a question to those so called leaders how he will become a martyr ,the killers of Indira Gandhi/ Rajiv Gandhi do they become martyr what is all this .

Why don't they affirm the truth that they are advocating the AFZAL GURU as he belongs to a particular religion if he were Hindu the scenario will be some thing different

Now the time has come when we have to think of those leaders become ministers MPs on our vote ,the vote of the majority and instead of doing for us they are providing facilities to a particular religion what is all this .We the people who are divided on caste by those leaders for their own benefits we have to thin and we have to get unite .if we will not get united now we have to face lot of problems in future may be we have to face the same condition as Kashmir pundits have faced .

In the following days, there is near chaos in the Kashmir valley with Chief Minister Farooq Abdullah and his National Conference government abdicating all responsibilities of the State. Masked men run amok, waving Kalashnikovs, shooting to kill and shouting anti-India slogans.

Reports of killing of Hindus, invariably Kashmiri Pandits, begin to trickle in; there are explosions; inflammatory speeches are made from the pulpits of mosques, using public address systems meant for calling the faithful to prayers. A terrifying fear psychosis begins to take grip of Kashmiri Pandits.

Walls are plastered with posters and handbills, summarily ordering all Kashmiris to strictly follow the Islamic dress code, prohibiting the sale and consumption of alcoholic drinks and imposing a ban on video parlours and cinemas. The masked men with Kalashnikovs force people to re-set their watches and clocks to Pakistan Standard Time.

Shops, business establishments and homes of Kashmiri Pandits, the original inhabitants of the Kashmir valley with a recorded cultural and civilisational history dating back 5,000 years, are marked out. Notices are pasted on doors of Pandit houses, peremptorily asking the occupants to leave Kashmir within 24 hours or face death and worse. Some are more lucid: "Be one with us, run, or die!"

* * *

Srinagar, January 19, 1990. Jagmohan arrives to take charge as governor of Jammu and Kashmir. Farooq Abdullah, whose pathetic, whimpering, snivelling government has all but ceased to exist and has gone into hiding, resigns and goes into a sulk. Curfew is imposed as a first measure to restore some semblance of law and order. But it fails to have a deterrent effect.

Throughout the day, Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front and Hizbul Mujahideen terrorists use public address systems at mosques to exhort people to defy curfew and take to the streets. Masked men, firing from their Kalashnikovs, march up and down, terrorising cowering Pandits who, by then, have locked themselves in their homes.

As evening falls, the exhortations become louder and shriller. Three taped slogans are repeatedly played the whole night from mosques: 'Kashmir mei agar rehna hai, Allah-O-Akbar kehna hai' (If you want to stay in Kashmir, you have to say Allah-O-Akbar); 'Yahan kya chalega, Nizam-e-Mustafa' (What do we want here? Rule of Shariah); 'Asi gachchi Pakistan, Batao roas te Batanev san' (We want Pakistan along with Hindu women but without their men).

In the preceding months, 300 Hindu men and women, nearly all of them Kashmiri Pandits, had been slaughtered ever since the brutal murder of Pandit Tika Lal Taploo, noted lawyer and BJP national executive member, by the JKLF in Srinagar on September 14, 1989. Soon after that, Justice N K Ganju of the Srinagar high court was shot dead. Pandit Sarwanand Premi, 80-year-old poet, and his son were kidnapped, tortured, their eyes gouged out, and hanged to death. A Kashmiri Pandit nurse working at the Soura Medical College Hospital in Srinagar was gang-raped and then beaten to death. Another woman was abducted, raped and sliced into bits and pieces at a sawmill.

In villages and towns across the Kashmir valley, terrorist hit lists have been floating about. All the names are of Kashmiri Pandits. With no government worth its name, the administration having collapsed and disappeared, the police nowhere to be seen, despondency sets in. As the night of January 19, 1990, wears itself out, despondency gives way to desperation.

And tens of thousands of Kashmiri Pandits across the valley take a painful decision: to flee their homeland to save their lives from rabid jihadis. Thus takes place a 20^th century Exodus.

* * *

Srinagar, January 19, 2008. There are no Kashmiri Pandits in Srinagar, or, for that matter, anywhere else in the Kashmir valley; they don't live here anymore. You can find them in squalid refugee camps in Jammu and Delhi. As many as 300,000 Kashmiri Pandits have fled their home and hearth and been reduced to living the lives of refugees in their own country.

Two-thirds of them are camping in Jammu. The rest are in Delhi and in other Indian cities. Many of them, once prosperous and proud of their rich heritage, now live in grovelling poverty, dependent on government dole and charity. In these 18 years, an entire generation of exiled Kashmiri Pandits has grown up, without seeing the land from where their parents fled to escape the brutalities of Islamic terrorism, a land they dare not return to, although that land still remains a part of their country.

A large number of them are suffering from a variety of stress and depression related diseases. A group of doctors who surveyed the mental and physical health of the Kashmiri Pandits living in refugee camps, found high incidence of 'economic distress, stress induced diabetes, partial lunacy, hypertension and mental retardation.' Statistics reflect high death rate and low birth rate among the Kashmiri Pandit refugees.

And thereby hangs a tragic tale that has been all but wiped out from public memory.

An entire people have been uprooted from the land of their ancestors and left to fend for themselves as a weak-kneed Indian state shamelessly panders to Islamic terrorists and separatists who claim they are the final arbiters of Jammu and Kashmir's destiny. A part of India's cultural heritage has been destroyed; a chapter of India's civilisational history has been erased.

Had this tragedy occurred elsewhere in Hindu majority India, and had the victims been Muslims, we would have described it as 'ethnic cleansing' and 'genocide.' We would have made films with horror-inducing titles. We would have filed cases in the Supreme Court of India. Our media would have marshalled remarkable rage in reporting the smallest detail.

But, this tragedy has occurred in Muslim majority Kashmir valley, and the victims are all Hindus, that too Pandits. What has been lost is part of India's Hindu culture, what has been erased is integral to India's Hindu civilisation.

Therefore, the government makes bold to record that the Kashmiri Pandits have "migrated on their own" and their 'displacement (is) self-imposed;' the National Human Rights Commission, after a perfunctory inquiry, refuses to concede that what has happened is 'genocide' or 'ethnic cleansing,' though facts add up to no less than that, never mind that 300,000 lives have been destroyed.

And, our jhola-wallah brigade of secular activists rudely turn up their noses to the plight of Kashmiri Pandits: Hindu sorrow, inflicted by Islamic terror, stinks.

Today, on 31march the 18 Year of the forced flight of Kashmiri Pandits, look back at India's wretched history of secular politics and consider the terrible price the nation has paid at the altar of appeasement because the Indian State has, and continues to, toe the line of least resistance.

What exactly Those Terrorist are proposing? Are they saying that They have a fundamental right of self-determination and Kashmiri Hindus don't have a right to exercise their fundamental right of political voice? terrorists can have a political voice and a peace-loving patriot cannot. What kind of standard is it

This all what happen in kashmir is the shame on the face of nation .India Known as secular democratic Republic all this is False .

India is heading towards a country servicing to a particular religion and illtreating the Hindus on the name of majority & Secularism

Secularism is nothing just a weapon to wipe out the hindus from the country this is game plan of those political leaders who dont have any ground .

Those so called leaders are dividing Hindus in the name of caste and providing relief in the name of minority to a particular religion .

What Afzal Guru has done is a heinous crime but why the government is not daring to hang him .

The country is above all and there should be no clemency to the people who want to endanger our mother land.

All those people/ Organisations who are pleading for the Clemency for Afzal Guru are Traitors and they should be booked against the crime of waging war against country.

Give us our right to die

We condemn any type of terrorism -Terrorism cannot be defined as the war of Independence